Looking back at my animation, I can see multiple improvements that could be made across different elements to raise the quality of the production.
To start with, I could of stuck to my storyboard or edited the animation to be a bit more interesting - instead of having periods where nothing particularly eye catching or compelling is being shown (for example, 0:12-0:26 could be sped up to save time). Another issue with the narrative is that there isn't one, with the video just following a ghost as he walks to work only to be cut off without anything really happening, leading to a video without any sort of genre or place to fit into. This leads to a plain animation which lacks a point to the story, which takes away from the design.
Speaking of the design, the style of animation also has it's faults - with the jumps in footage and models moving backwards and not going at a steady pace throughout. Whilst there is a reason for this - the equipment used not being made for animation - the finished product still suffers, with the lighting making everything look grey and, as stated above, the video being slow and having meaningless content. A smoother animation looks something like this:
'A Paper Cut Out Animation' by Rebecca Petersson
On a positive note, the base idea and creative possibilities for this animation were plentiful, and without the time or technical restraints it could of been vastly improved - plus on comparison to previous videos (like 'Stars'), there is some aspects which are superior, like focus on what is happening and the ability to see the video clearly, not to mention the fact that my animation stays within the time constraints given and does not overrun by a few seconds.
As for the audience of my animation, it seems like they agree with my evaluation due to the similar responses seen on the survey that was filled out.
This graph shows how people think my animation could be improved, with the majority of people believing that the narrative could be built upon - one person stating 'Film more [...], rather than the 4 seconds of the stairs' which supports my point about meaningless content and another viewer pointing out that 'It was a little slow paced', which shows that both mine and the spectators view are shared.
This second graph shows what the audience thought was the best part, although here there is some difference in opinion between me and the viewers as I personally believe the design of the characters was better than the animation style - which was the popular vote here. However, the numbers for this chart are slightly irregular with some people having checked multiple boxes on the survey causing the total percentage to equal out at 150%.
Based on the responses I got and my own views, the most crucial improvement that needs to be made is to the narrative - this can be done by changing the story all together or continuing on from where the animation left off. This seems to be the most important due to the focus on the story and not on the animation itself, which is average at best with how it lacks a background or any colour.
Original Story Board
On the subject of the animation, that is another thing that needs to be improved, by using a better quality camera so the images used look clearer and a professional set up instead of what I used. This would make the final product look more polished and well lit, not to mention less jumpy as with the proper equipment and software I would be able to use an 'onion skin' to track the previous image and make everything appear smoother.
Animation Set Up
Smaller improvements that could be made revolve around the character design and context of the story.
Character Designs
However, I don't think I will make these improvements because I would rather start on new animations and pieces of work. It would also be difficult to edit without completely redoing the animation, something that I may do in the future.













